Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Lent 3a - Romans 5:1-11

Since it is God’s love that is proved in the death of Christ whatever Paul means by being “saved from the wrath of God” cannot be understood as an angry God needing to be appeased or there will be hell to pay. It just doesn’t follow that a wrathful God initiates the action to be reconciled to us (humanity) while we were weak, while we were sinners, while we were God’s enemies, as if God just needed to kill something in order to spare humanity. I know Paul says that the blood of Jesus justifies but the entire religious world of his day practiced ritual sacrifice as a means of motivating the gods or in the case of the Jews atoning for sin. To be sure there are those who hold to a classic doctrine of atonement where God’s holiness does not allow for mercy without payment due, but that seems to make God subject to our religious systems. Again if it is God’s love that is proved surely God is free to forgive with or without the cross. So what is the purpose of Jesus death? I affirm it is for the forgiveness sins but not to appease a wrathful God, but rather to transform us so that what Paul preaches in Romans five might be accomplished. Peace with God means we no longer live as God’s enemies but instead our love for God is proved when we boast not in our strength or our piety but in our hope. That hope is not illusory but tested by suffering, proved by enduring, confirmed in our character it is the way we live the faith that justifies and is the only hope of peace for the humanity God loves.  

3 comments:

  1. "To be sure there are those who hold to a classic doctrine of atonement where God’s holiness does not allow for mercy without payment due, but that seems to make God subject to our religious systems."

    Well, hmm. God's "religious system" required sacrifices for a couple thousand years, then came the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. B/c He is a holy God and sin must be paid for in order for us to have a relationship with Him. I guess I'm just one who holds to that "classic doctrine of atonement." : )

    ReplyDelete
  2. It may not sound like it but I hold to the doctrine of atonement, but not because God is bound by it. God cannot be constrained by God's holiness and still be Almighty - without limits. The doctrine of atonement is for our sake. We need to be forgiven because we are by nature fickle creatures hell bent on destruction.

    ReplyDelete